22.7 C
Islamabad
Wednesday, October 9, 2024

Pakistan Needs Unified Strategy for Sustainable Growth and Investment: Azfar Ahsan

By: Faiz Paracha ISLAMABAD: Muhammad Azfar Ahsan, former...

Insecure Life in Shikarpur, the Renowned Old Paris of Sindh

By: Nuzair Ali Jamro There is no denying...

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts

PILDAT releases comparative assessment of performance of Provincial Assemblies

ISLAMABAD: As Provincial Assemblies have completed third parliamentary year, PILDAT’s comparative assessment of performance of Pakistan’s 4 Provincial Assemblies shows that while Assemblies outrank each other in different KPIs, each Assembly records a decline in legislation, working hours and attendance of Chief Ministers compared to second parliamentary year.
 
Provincial Assembly of the Punjab has met for the highest number of sittings, 61, during the third parliamentary year in a comparative analysis of sittings held by each of the four Provincial Assemblies. However, the sittings of the Punjab Assembly have reduced by about 9% from 67 in year 2 to 61 in year 3. Provincial Assembly of Sindh has met for 57 sittings during the year, sittings of Provincial Assembly of Sindh during the third year have declined by 16% from the 68 sittings held in the second parliamentary year. Provincial Assembly of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa ranks third in Provincial Assemblies in terms of holding in terms of holding 55 sittings in year 3, sittings of the Provincial Assembly of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in year 3 have recorded an increase of nearly 6% from second parliamentary year when the Assembly had held 52 sittings. Provincial Assembly of Balochistan which ranks last in comparative analysis of working days during third parliamentary year among four provincial assemblies met for 49 sittings, Balochistan Assembly during third parliamentary year have seen an increase of 48% over 33 sittings held during the second year.
 
During the third year, average working hours per sitting work out to be 1.42 in Punjab Assembly, 2.13 in Sindh Assembly, 2.4 in KP Assembly and 2.32 in Balochistan Assembly. 
 
During the third parliamentary year, the allocated budget per working hour is calculated to be PKR 25.7 M per working hour in the Provincial Assembly of the Punjab, PKR 21.6 M per working hour in the Provincial Assembly of Sindh, PKR 17.2 M per working hour in Provincial Assembly of Balochistan and PKR 8.8 M per working hour in the Provincial Assembly of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. In this sense, the KP Assembly is the most cost-effective provincial assembly followed by Balochistan Assembly and Sindh Assembly with Punjab Assembly being the least cost effective.
 
The Provincial Assembly for Khyber Pakhtunkhwa ranks on the top when compared with other Provincial Assemblies in terms of 147.02 working hours during the third year. The working hours of the Assembly have recorded an increase of about 30% when compared to 113.32 working hours during the second year of the Assembly. The Provincial Assembly of Sindh has met for 126.14 working hours which is a decrease of about 25% in working hours compared to the second year when the Assembly met for 168.15 working hours.
 
The working hours of 124 during the third parliamentary year in the Provincial Assembly of Balochistan have increased by about 11% from the second parliamentary year when the Assembly had met for 111.39 working hours. In its third parliamentary year, the current Punjab Assembly has been convened for 102.44 hours compared to 140.32 hours during the second parliamentary year, recording a decrease of 27% in working hours between two years.
 
During the third year, Chief Minister Balochistan, Jam Kamal Khan, MPA, has attended the highest percentage (29%) of sittings of the Provincial Assembly of Balochistan followed by Syed Murad Ali Shah, MPA and Chief Minister Sindh who has attended 21% sittings of the Sindh Assembly. A distant third is Sardar Usman Ahmed Khan Buzdar, MPA and Chief Minister of Punjab who only joined 8% sittings of the Punjab Assembly. In the last position is Mr. Mahmood Khan, MPA and Chief Minister Khyber Pakhtunkhwa who has attended only 5% sittings of the Provincial Assembly of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
 
In general, with each passing parliamentary year, each Provincial Assembly has witnessed a decrease in attendance of Chief Ministers in Assembly sessions with the only exception of CM Punjab whose attendance during the third year improved by a miniscule 1 percentage point over the second year.
 
29% attendance of Chief Minister Balochistan during the third year had decreased by 4 percentage points compared to 33% attendance during the second year. Attendance of Syed Murad Ali Shah, MPA and Chief Minister Sindh has declined by 10 percentage points from year 2 when he attended 31% sittings and year 3 when he could attend only 21% sittings.
 
8% attendance of Sardar Usman Ahmed Khan Buzdar, MPA, Chief Minister Punjab increased by one percentage point in the third year compared to 7% in the second year. In the third parliamentary year, 5% attendance of Mr. Mahmood Khan, MPA, Chief Minister Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, declined by one percentage point from 6% attendance during the second year.  
 
Leader of the Opposition in the Provincial Assembly of Balochistan, Malik Sikandar Khan, MPA, tops in the comparative analysis as he attended 73% sittings of the Balochistan Assembly during the third parliamentary year. Attendance of the Leader of the Opposition in Sindh Assembly was 63%. (It must be noted that Syed Firdous Shamim Naqvi, MPA resigned as the Leader of the Opposition on January 08, 2021 and Mr. Haleem Adil Sheikh, MPA replaced him on January 26, 2021. This is a combined attendance of both.) Mr. Akram Khan Durrani, MPA and Leader of the Opposition in the Provincial Assembly of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa attended 31% sittings of the assembly. Mr. Muhammad Hamza Shahbaz Sharif, MPA and Leader of the Opposition in the Punjab Assembly only attended 5% sittings of the Assembly in the third parliamentary year
 
During the third parliamentary year ending on August 12, 2021, Provincial Assembly of Sindh has passed 38 bills, followed by Provincial Assembly of the Punjab which has passed 34 bills, Provincial Assembly of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa which has passed 33 bills and Provincial Assembly of Balochistan which has passed 26 bills.
 
In terms of average bills passed by each Provincial Assembly in three years of the current term compared to the 3 years average of previous terms of each Provincial Assembly, only the Provincial Assembly of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has recorded improved legislative activity of average 122 bills compared to 83 bills in previous tenure. This is an increase of 47% in average legislative activity. The Provincial Assembly of Sindh has passed an average of 74 bills or 35% fewer bills in first three years compared to the average of 114 bills passed by previous assembly in first three years. The Provincial Assembly of Balochistan has passed 45 bills on average in first three years, which is a decrease of 25% bills compared to average 60 bills passed in first three years of the previous Balochistan assembly. The Provincial Assembly of Punjab has passed an average of 92 bills in first three years which is a decrease of 19% compared to the average of 114 bills passed by previous Punjab Assembly in first three years.
 
In the third parliamentary year, Provincial Assembly of the Punjab has spent 12 days in budget session, down from 13 days spent in year 2. Budget session during third parliamentary year in the Provincial Assembly of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was only 9 days, compared to 7 days in year 2. Provincial Assembly of Sindh has spent 8 days in its budget session during parliamentary year three, compared to 10 days of budget session in parliamentary year 2. Provincial Assembly of Balochistan has utilized only 7 days in its budget session during the third parliamentary year, consistent with the number of days in year 2.
 
Instead of accelerating their performance on each of the key performance indicators (KPIs), Provincial Assemblies have shown a declining trend across most, if not all, KPIs. Much like the previous years, little or no initiative has been taken in inviting public input and involvement and enhancing transparency and access for citizens.
 
 

Popular Articles